Core happy path
User follows the expected flow: No user path listed.
Unspecified AI feature completes the main job without requiring a human to correct material facts.
Generate eval cases, pass criteria, and edge cases from an AI feature, risks, and user path.
User follows the expected flow: No user path listed.
Unspecified AI feature completes the main job without requiring a human to correct material facts.
The user gives a vague one-line request or resubmits after removing critical context.
The assistant asks for the minimum missing information instead of producing a confident but unverifiable answer.
Turn an AI feature description into an evaluation plan before shipping. Enter the feature, known risks, and user journey. The planner generates happy-path cases, risk-driven cases, journey-step cases, pass criteria, and edge cases, then lets you copy the Markdown plan or export JSON. It is useful for LLM product managers, AI engineers, QA leads, and operations teams who need a first eval suite before writing harness code. The tool does not run model calls or score outputs. It creates a clear, reviewable plan entirely in the browser so you can turn messy launch concerns into testable cases.
Paste or drop your content into the tool panel.
Click the button. All processing is local in your browser.
Copy the result or download to disk in one click.
Use it to plan, compare, or structure AI work before spending time or tokens on the real run.
These links move the current task into a more complete workflow.
A team describes the AI feature, lists risks from the design review, and enters the user path. The planner produces cases and pass criteria that can be reviewed before engineering writes the final eval harness.
Security, legal, and operations concerns often sit in a spreadsheet. Paste those risk lines here and the tool turns each one into a concrete scenario with expected behavior.
QA can copy the Markdown into a test plan so reviewers judge model behavior against explicit criteria instead of arguing about whether an answer "feels good".
Testing only the ideal prompt and skipping handoff steps where context is missing or stale.
Listing abstract risks like "quality" instead of concrete failures that can be reproduced.
Writing pass criteria that cannot be judged by two reviewers the same way.
Forgetting to store failing inputs, actual outputs, expected outputs, and risk tags for regression tracking.
Feature descriptions, risk lists, user paths, generated Markdown, and exported JSON are all created locally in the browser. The planner does not call a model, upload roadmap details, fetch templates, or store your plan in localStorage.
Folks in your role tend to reach for these alongside this tool.